Stay informed with free updates
Simply sign up to the War in Ukraine myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is making a last-ditch bid to secure crucial Belgian support for an EU plan to use frozen Russian sovereign assets to fund European military aid to Ukraine.
Merz will travel to Brussels on Friday to dine with Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, who has become the biggest obstacle to a so-called reparations loan for Kyiv backed by the assets.
European officials are rushing to get backing for the plan ahead of an EU leaders summit in two weeks. The US has pressured the bloc to leave the assets untouched to use them as part of a possible peace settlement with Russia.
“I don’t want to pressure [De Wever], I want to convince him that the solution we are proposing here is the right one,” Merz said on Thursday. “This money must go to Ukraine, it must help Ukraine.”
He added: “This is a European issue, I see no way of sending the money we have mobilised to the USA . . . and the US government knows that.”
The meeting comes days after European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen unveiled legal proposals for the loan, which rely on emergency powers in EU treaties to keep Russian assets frozen indefinitely, and push the loan through while bypassing potential national vetoes.
“It is a race against the clock,” said a German government insider. Another added: “Merz thinks it is on his shoulders to carry this over the line.”
The first draft of a 28-point peace plan, written by US and Russian officials, called for the assets to be deployed in investment projects that would earn profits for American firms.
Merz supports the proposal and use of the Article 122 emergency powers, even if Belgium remains opposed, according to people familiar with his position. A spokesman for the German government declined to comment on the message Merz intends to deliver to De Wever.
In order to attend, the German leader rescheduled his first state visit to Norway, where he had been due to meet the King as well as Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre. Von der Leyen will also take part in the Brussels dinner.
Writing in the Financial Times in September, the German chancellor endorsed leveraging about €210bn of Russian central bank assets immobilised in Europe for Ukraine. That marked a reversal from earlier scepticism, driven partly by fears it could undermine confidence in the euro, according to people with knowledge of his thinking.
“He is taking a high risk and throwing his whole weight behind it,” said Carlo Masala, professor of international relations at the Bundeswehr University Munich. “It shows how serious he is about the issue.”
Belgium and Brussels-based Euroclear, a clearing house and central securities depositary which holds most of the assets, have threatened to block the plan without “cast-iron” guarantees that the other EU countries would also bear the brunt of any financial burden or retaliation from Moscow.
Several countries, including France, have balked at issuing national guarantees for the loan, needed in case Euroclear is required to return the assets to Moscow. The European Central Bank has declined to provide emergency liquidity to Euroclear should those guarantees be triggered.
Recent talks over a deal to end Moscow’s war on Ukraine have injected fresh urgency into the debate. Merz and other European leaders, who were excluded from the US-Russia negotiations, were alarmed to discover that the discussions touched directly on the Russian sovereign assets held in Europe, according to several people close to the chancellery.
Norbert Röttgen, a senior MP from Merz’s CDU party, described the decision on Russian assets as “Europe’s moment of truth”. He added: “If we can’t do this [the reparations loan], then what does it say about Europe’s sovereignty and all that talk about strategic autonomy?”
For Berlin, the need to secure the assets quickly and send a political signal to Moscow and Washington now outweighs legal caution, the people said. While Berlin has urged the commission to address Belgium’s concerns, it believes that there is no alternative to the loan to keep Ukraine solvent.
Germany’s push is also partly driven by concerns that the country, which has relaxed its debt brake to allow virtually unlimited spending on defence, risks having to shoulder most of the cost of supplying Ukraine with military equipment.
“We will end up paying the bill,” one of the people said.
Credit: Source link
