Mr Singh denied having read the email, despite being presented with evidence that he saved a copy to his hard drive and printed it off.
The email was sent on 8 October 2010 by Rob Wilson, head of the Post Office’s criminal law team at the time. He alerted the Post Office to a series of incidents where money in Horizon had “disappeared at branch level” and incorrect balances were shown.
When asked by Mr Beer whether this email “ought to have rung alarm bells”, Mr Singh responded: “Yes.”
The following week, Mrs Misra’s case began. She was eventually found guilty of false accounting and theft, sentenced to 10 months in prison, and jailed while pregnant on her son’s 10th birthday.
The email was not disclosed in her trial.
Prosecution lawyers have a duty to disclose documents that could undermine their case in criminal trials.
Mr Beer showed evidence suggesting Mr Singh had saved an attachment about Horizon discrepancies to his hard drive, and printed it off on 8 October 2010.
“I don’t recall seeing it, I don’t recall printing it,” Mr Singh said.
When asked whether it was saved on the hard drive of his computer, Mr Singh said: “I don’t even know what you’re talking about.
“I don’t know how these things worked.”
“You don’t know how to save a document?” Mr Beer asked.
“I didn’t know how to do it,” Mr Singh responded, saying he wouldn’t have had the technical knowledge either to do that or to understand the document itself.
“I don’t remember this document at all, or the email,” he added.
Mr Beer said Mr Singh was engaged in “blind denial” because “this is evidence of your own guilty knowledge”.
Mr Singh replied: “That is not true, and I don’t feel guilty, because I haven’t received it, because if I did, I would have dealt with it.
“I don’t recaIl receiving it, or reading it, or printing it – that is my evidence on oath.”
Mr Beer had earlier shown emails sent in 2013 and 2015 which said Mr Singh had only become aware of bugs in Horizon when a report by forensic accountants Second Sight was published in July 2013.
However, Mr Beer accused Mr Singh of a “cover-up”, which Mr Singh denied.
“There has been no cover-up on my part, and never will be,” he said.
A little later, following more denials from Mr Singh, Mr Beer said: “All of this: ‘If I received it, if I read it’ – it’s a big fat lie, isn’t it? And you know it, Mr Singh.”
Mr Singh responded: “Sir, I didn’t come here to lie, I’m at an age where I have come to assist the inquiry. And that’s all.”
Mrs Misra, who was present during the session, was asked during the lunch break whether she believed Mr Singh. “No,” she told the BBC.
She said she had been fighting the Post Office since 2005, but added that “now we’re going in the right direction” in terms of what the inquiry was finding out.
Credit: Source link
