With all the capital that private equity and other sources are investing in the CPA firm world, it is easy to be romanced into joining the parade of sellers looking to take money off the table.
Processing Content
Dealmaking is heavily weighted to valuation and payout, but other factors must be addressed to ensure success. Buyers expect sellers to partner with them to improve the top and bottom lines. Of course, both sides want to make money. But how they get there is crucial.
Too many sellers enter deals without fully understanding what will be expected of them or how the buyer’s post‑closing decisions may affect their ability to meet those expectations. If any portion of the seller’s payout is tied to future performance, the stakes are even higher.
Sellers must know whether they will have the authority, resources, support and protections necessary to succeed—and should feel energized, not intimidated, about digging in and optimizing those terms.
Here are five key areas sellers should proactively address to set themselves and their future partners up for long‑term success.
Establish safe harbors for integration challenges
Integration challenges including technology conversions, workflow changes, staffing transitions and process realignments are inevitable.
I have witnessed horror stories about trying to convert a database that was supposed to work but didn’t — or about the improper timing of integration or systems conversion.
What is clear is that sellers should not be penalized for shortcomings outside their control.
It would also be wise to negotiate mechanisms to protect compensation when performance is hindered by inadequate resources, staffing delays or operational bottlenecks.
While not every issue can be written directly into the deal, sellers can negotiate safe harbors that protect them when buyer‑driven delays or decisions impede performance.
Clarify business development expectations
A common source of post‑closing frustration is misaligned expectations around sales and business development. Sellers must understand:
- Will they be held accountable for specific revenue targets?
- Are there defined metrics or growth goals?
- How will they be supported in achieving those goals?
I once worked with a seller whose practice had grown steadily through client expansion. The firm’s trajectory looked strong, and the buyer assumed they could replicate that growth in a larger firm. But after closing, the buyer expected the seller to generate entirely new business — unrelated to his existing client base. He had no idea this was coming, and the magnitude of the expectation blindsided him. Had he known, he may have walked away from the deal.
While buyers should formulate the financial return they expect in the first three years of a deal, sellers should collaborate on that model so expectations can be scaled properly, and results can be desirable, achievable and measurable.
Understand the marketing and regional growth strategy
Buyers will expect top‑line growth, so the seller should know whether they will have a voice in shaping the marketing strategy for their region, office or practice area.
Sellers should question how the buyer will invest in the brand visibility or regional expansion, and what resources will be allocated to support growth.
Sellers will best meet targets if they have influence over the strategies to achieve them.
Define authority on client continuity and procedures
Nobody wants to lose clients, especially good ones. Sellers must probe to understand who decides which clients the firm accepts and who has authority to terminate clients.
Buyers often refine the profile of clients they want to serve. However, if the buyer tightens client acceptance criteria or terminates legacy clients, the seller’s post‑closing economics may be directly affected.
Relatedly, existing clients often represent the most immediate opportunity through expanded services or fee increases. Sellers must assess:
• Who controls decisions on billing and collections?
• Will they have the authority to raise fees?
• How will client service changes be communicated?
• Are there expectations for cross‑selling or upselling?
Fee increases can be particularly sensitive. In many firms, fees rise without expanding services, and sellers may face pressure to implement increases they are uncomfortable with.
Establishing guardrails for fee increases for recurring work and collection controls for receivables is essential.
Maximize employee retention and satisfaction
Key employees can be the backbone of client relationships. If those employees leave post‑closing, the seller’s economics may suffer.
Too many sellers have watched valued team members depart because their roles were not clearly defined, their compensation changed unexpectedly, or they felt vulnerable or misunderstood by new leadership.
Sellers should negotiate commitments around job descriptions, compensation and participation in first‑year evaluations — and clarify what exactly they will be responsible for post‑closing.
The bottom line: deal terms shape economics
Every issue outlined here affects the economics of the deal. If expectations, authority, resources or protections are unclear, the seller may not receive their anticipated buyout.
Many deals include a built‑in control valve: If revenue or profit falls short, the seller takes the hit. But if the seller lacks the tools, authority, information, staffing or support needed to succeed, they are being set up to fail.
Deal terms are not just about price. They are about control, accountability, support and protection. Sellers cannot assume the buyer’s growth plan will work. They must understand how the plan will be executed, what role they will play, and what happens if the buyer’s integration or growth strategy falls short.
Optimizing deal terms is not self‑serving. It is essential to ensuring both parties achieve the future they envisioned when they decided to join forces.
Credit: Source link
